GST&VAT&CST
No Review Of Writ When GSTAT Appeal Is Available: Madhya Pradesh High Court
In a case involving bogus invoicing, the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 16 January reiterated that when an appellate remedy is available before the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), review of an earlier order which declined a writ petition was not warranted. A Division Bench of Justice Vivek Rusia and Justice Binod Kumar Dwivedi was hearing a review petition against its 5 August 2025 decision, which had relegated the petitioner to the remedy of appeal before GSTAT. The Bench...
Kerala High Court Upholds Order Against Detention Of Hindustan Coca-Cola's Goods In GST Dispute
The Kerala High Court has dismissed a writ appeal filed by the state tax authorities against Hindustan Coca Cola Private Limited over the detention of its goods during transit under the GST Act. The court held that the detention was not justified because the consignment was accompanied by all required documents. A Division Bench of Justice V.G. Arun and Justice Harisankar V. Menon said proceedings under Section 129 of the Central and State GST Acts were not called for in the facts of the...
Kerala HC Grants Interim Relief To Retired Union Bank Employees From GST On Group Health Insurance Premium
The Kerala High Court on Monday granted interim relief to retired employees and family pensioners of Union Bank of India. It directed the Union government, GST authorities, and Union Bank of India not to levy GST on health insurance premiums paid under the group medical insurance policy for the policy year 2025–26. A Division Bench of Justices V.G. Arun and Harisankar V. Menon passed the order while admitting a writ appeal against a Single Bench decision. The Bench said, “Till then, there...
Free Materials In Works Contracts Pre-July 2009 Excludible From Service Tax: CESTAT Ahmedabad
On 15 January, the Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the value of free materials provided under an indivisible Works Contract cannot be included in taxable value for service tax purposes for contracts executed before 7 July 2009. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Dr. Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member Mr. Satendra Vikram Singh set aside the portion of the service tax demand calculated on 933.355 MT of steel, valued at Rs....
Karnataka High Court Refuses Daughter's Plea For Parents' Interim Bail In GST Evasion Case
The Karnataka High Court has declined to grant interim bail to a husband and wife arrested in a GST enforcement action, holding that the case did not present circumstances warranting the court's intervention at the writ stage. A Single Judge Bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna, in an order pronounced on January 12, noted that the court did not find any illegality in the manner of arrest and that statutory remedies for seeking bail were already available under criminal law. “Therefore, the facts in...
No Profiteering Where Builder Absorbs Differential GST Burden: GSTAT
The Principal Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), New Delhi, held that anti-profiteering proceedings cannot be sustained in the absence of evidence showing that GST benefits were withheld from homebuyers, and accordingly closed two separate complaints against real estate developers—Raja Housing and Legacy Global. Both matters were heard together by a Bench presided over by Justice (Retd.) Dr. Sanjaya Kumar Mishra. In both cases, the Director General of...
Gauhati High Court Stays GST Demand On Flats Given For Free To Landowners
The Gauhati High Court on 7 January stayed coercive action pursuant to a GST demand raised on flats provided free of cost to landowners under a development agreement. A Bench of Justice Soumitra Saikia was hearing a writ petition filed by a developer challenging a consolidated show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST), covering multiple financial years from 2017–18 to 2022–23. The notices proposed a levy of GST on flats handed over free of...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds 200% VAT Penalty On Trader For Bogus Bill Trading
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has upheld a penalty equal to 200% of the tax imposed on an iron and steel trader for issuing false tax invoices without actual movement of goods to facilitate wrongful availment of input tax credit. A Division Bench of Justice R. Raghunandan Rao and Justice T.C.D. Sekhar dismissed a writ petition challenging a penalty of Rs 50.52 lakh levied under Section 55(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, for the period from June 2014 to June 2016. The...
GST Proceedings Cannot Be Initiated Against Deceased Proprietor: Andhra Pradesh High Court Reiterates
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has recently reiterated that GST authorities cannot initiate assessment or adjudication proceedings in the name of a deceased proprietor, even where the tax demand relates to a period when the business was active. A Division Bench of Justice R. Raghunandan Rao and Justice T.C.D. Sekhar clarified that Section 93 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, a provision that allows recovery of tax payable by deceased persons, does not authorise the initiation of fresh...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Holds Solar Power EPC Contract Eligible for 8.9% GST, Quashes 18% Demand
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has recently ruled that contracts for setting up solar power generating systems cannot be taxed at 18% GST merely because they involve erection and commissioning work. Holding that such contracts are covered by a concessional GST notification, the court said tax must be levied at an effective rate of 8.9% and set aside a higher assessment raised by GST authorities. A division bench of Justices R. Raghunandan Rao and T.C.D. Sekhar said the benefit of the...
Supreme Court Grants Bail To Four Accused In Fake ITC Case After Consistent Trial Appearance
The Supreme Court recently granted bail to four persons accused of operating a network of fake firms to fraudulently avail Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the GST law. The top court held that their continuous appearance before the trial court amounted to “constructive custody” and that remanding them to jail would serve no useful purpose at this stage. A bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma was hearing appeals filed by the accused, who were arrested in 2021 by the...